ExposeIQ launches jury selection tools for product liability trials

ExposeIQ says its JuryFit platform is helping product liability teams screen jurors, test arguments and prepare voir dire in cases built on technical evidence. The company says the system combines human verification with virtual jury simulations to support attorney decision-making in high-stakes trials.

Why it matters: - Product liability trials often turn on complex questions about defects, warnings, manufacturing standards and causation. - ExposeIQ is positioning JuryFit as a way for litigation teams to bring more structure to jury selection in technically demanding cases. - The platform is designed to help attorneys identify juror profiles that may better fit a case theory before trial starts.

What happened: - ExposeIQ said June 29, 2026, that product liability teams are using JuryFit Plus and its Virtual Mirror Jury™ tools to optimize jury selection. - JuryFit is part of ExposeIQ’s LENS trial intelligence suite. - The platform analyzes case narratives against 16 juror personality profiles. - Human verification is built into the process at every step, including juror profile selection and voir dire question development. - The company says the system is tailored to product cases that involve technical evidence and scientific testimony.

The details: - JuryFit identifies juror personality blends most likely to align with a case theory. - The platform helps qualify voir dire questions for trial teams. - Virtual Mirror Jury™ creates simulations based on seated jurors’ profiles. - Trial teams can use the simulations to test arguments involving risk-utility analysis, warnings or post-sale conduct. - The tool is intended to create a virtual deliberation environment for pretrial strategy. - ExposeIQ says the preparation can increase confidence when presenting engineering or scientific evidence. - The platform also maps how different personality profiles may respond to evidence of defect, warnings or corporate decision-making. - ExposeIQ says many practitioners use that kind of preparation to build panels better equipped for the scientific and factual issues in product cases. - All platform outputs are decision-support resources and require independent review by licensed attorneys. - Results vary by matter.

Between the lines: - The announcement reflects growing demand for litigation tools that support, rather than replace, lawyer judgment in specialized practice areas. - ExposeIQ is emphasizing human review to make the product more credible for law firms handling high-stakes cases. - The focus on mirror juries suggests trial teams want a more data-driven way to anticipate how jurors may react to technical evidence.

What’s next: - ExposeIQ is likely to continue marketing JuryFit and the broader LENS suite to high-stakes litigation teams. - Product liability lawyers using the platform still have to independently evaluate its outputs before relying on them in trial strategy.

The bottom line: - ExposeIQ is betting that jury analytics plus human review can help attorneys make better decisions in product liability cases where technical evidence drives outcomes.